Megan Thee Stallion just scored a major legal victory.
A jury has officially ruled that blogger Milagro Gramz defamed the Houston rapper by spreading false claims and collaborating with Tory Lanez to undermine her account of the 2020 shooting. The verdict concludes a high-profile case that highlighted the damaging impact of misinformation and the emotional toll of online harassment.
According to legal reporter Meghann Cuniff, who covered the trial extensively, the jury found Gramz liable for both defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Cuniff explained that while the jury gave mixed answers on whether Gramz should be classified strictly as a media figure, they ultimately still held her responsible — awarding Megan $75,000 in damages.
The lawsuit accused Gramz of amplifying false narratives, including a deepfake video that intensified Megan’s emotional distress. The court found that Gramz acted intentionally to harm Megan’s credibility during the highly publicized Tory Lanez case.
A Landmark Moment for Megan
For years, Megan has spoken openly about the emotional burden caused by the online smear campaigns targeting her. This ruling represents not just a financial win, but a symbolic one — validating her stance against those who sought to distort her story.
While Gramz may still attempt to challenge the verdict, especially regarding her media classification, the jury’s decision sets a strong precedent about accountability in the digital age.
Who Is Milagro Gramz?
Gramz rose to prominence as a gossip blogger, primarily covering Megan and Tory Lanez’s legal saga. Her commentary repeatedly faced criticism from journalists who accused her of biased reporting and misinformation. Now, following the denied retrial attempt for Tory Lanez and this verdict, she faces both reputational and financial consequences.
For Megan, this chapter closes with a significant victory — one that may influence future conversations about media ethics and the impact of digital defamation.
